|
1
|
- Coulee Visions:
- Creating Quality Choices
- for the LaCrosse Region
|
|
2
|
- Revitalize core areas
- Encourage redevelopment
- Discourage “sprawl” type development
- Reduce public infrastructure costs
- Discourage the movement of jobs from one community to another
- Reduce vehicular travel demand
- Increase capacity through transportation system management
- Preserve existing infrastructure
- Improve and expand transit system
- Enhance bicycle and pedestrian system effectiveness
|
|
3
|
- Assist local governments in updating their comprehensive plans as
required by Wisconsin Statutes §66.0295.
- Develop land use scenarios for the 2035 update of the La Crosse
Long-Range Transportation Plan.
- Demonstrate multimodal development principles using real-world scenarios
found within the Coulee Region.
|
|
4
|
- Land Use Transportation Planning Relationship
- Five Smart Planning Principles
- Why Planning Matters
- Four Keys to Plans that Matter
- Demonstration of Planning Principles
- Obstacles
- Development Review Guidelines
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
- Connections
- Building Scale and Orientation
- Land Use Mix and Integration
- Parking (size and location)
- “Town and Country” Community Character
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
- Connections
- Building Scale and Orientation
- Land Use Mix and Integration
- Parking (size and location)
- “Town and Country” Community Character
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
25
|
- Architectural detailing
- Articulated façade
- Pedestrian-scale sign
- Street front display windows
- Awnings
- Building entrance next to street
|
|
26
|
|
|
27
|
- Connections
- Building Scale and Orientation
- Land Use Mix and Integration
- Parking (size and location)
- “Town and Country” Community Character
|
|
28
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
35
|
- Connections
- Building Scale and Orientation
- Land Use Mix and Integration
- Parking (size and location)
- “Town and Country” Community Character
|
|
36
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
44
|
- Connections
- Building Scale and Orientation
- Land Use Mix and Integration
- Parking (size and location)
- “Town and Country” Community Character
|
|
45
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
50
|
- Citizen Ownership
- Predictable Outcomes Through Precise Codes
- Graphic Products
- Frequent Updates and Monitoring
|
|
51
|
- Real estate developers
- Farmers
- Major land owners
- Major employers
- Faith-based communities
- Chambers of commerce
- Neighborhood associations
- Minority representatives
- Educational institutions
- State and regional agencies
- Editorial boards
- Bankers and realtors
- Economic development officials
- Elected officials
- Environmental interest groups
- Merchant associations
- Convention and visitor bureaus
- Emergency management officials
|
|
52
|
|
|
53
|
- Create a diverse and committed community steering committee
- Focus on creating the future rather than reacting to trends
- Organize regular public meetings to inform and illustrate plan progress
- Create graphic illustrations of alternative visions
- Provide alternative ways to inform and collect citizen input:
- Newsletters
- Web site
- Community forums & workshops
- Speaker’s bureau
- Media plan
- Visual preference surveys
|
|
54
|
- Citizen Ownership
- Predictable Outcomes Through Precise Codes
- Graphic Products
- Frequent Updates and Monitoring
|
|
55
|
- Illustrate what is allowed (prescriptive) rather than what is prohibited
(proscriptive)
- Focus on allowable building types rather than allowable land uses
- Graphically illustrate the desired condition
- Be flexible to allow for innovation
|
|
56
|
- Be easily interpreted by professionals and lay people
- Provide incentives through bonuses and expedited permitting processes
- Use capital investments as a means to leverage (re)development
|
|
57
|
- Use maximum standards instead of minimum standards
- Be precise in terms of building placement, parking size and location,
connections, landscape, signage, architectural details, and location of
transit and bicycle facilities
|
|
58
|
|
|
59
|
- Citizen Ownership
- Predictable Outcomes Through Precise Codes
- Graphic Products
- Frequent Updates and Monitoring
|
|
60
|
- Illustrate what is “pre-approved”
- Include both eye-level and plan views
- Be precise to include streetscape projects and the desired location of
building footprints
|
|
61
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
65
|
- Citizen Ownership
- Predictable Outcomes Through Precise Codes
- Graphic Products
- Frequent Updates and Monitoring
|
|
66
|
- Review plan every two years:
- Amendments
- Competitive advantage to neighboring jurisdictions
- Community support, opposition?
- Are economic development goals being met?
- Are community character goals being met?
- Are community mobility goals being met?
|
|
67
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
87
|
- Streetscape improvements
- Mixed use infill
- Incorporate Village Park into downtown activity
- Additional on-street parking combined with traffic calming features
- Re-establish West Salem’s “center” as a place for continued commerce
|
|
88
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
93
|
- What baseline information do we need to get started?
- Aerial photography?
- GIS data layers?
- How will I determine my community’s vision for the future?
- What are my community’s values?
- How will my community’s plan effect development mobility and the Coulee
character?
- How will my community’s plan fit into the regional development
framework?
|
|
94
|
- What partners do I need to bring aboard early in the process?
- What obstacles might be encountered?
- How will my community deal with future congestion?
- What trends would I like to change?
- What should be the future role of transit?
|
|
95
|
|